Star Trek: Beyond Review

            So here is yet another dark confession that I have to make to my fellow nerds:  I like the J.J. Abrams Star Trek films.  They aren’t masterpieces by any means but they are solid enough summer blockbuster fare and watching the films is a decent way to spend a couple of hours.  The first film was an okay origin story and was, if we’re being honest, the shot in the arm that the franchise needed to bring it into the modern blockbuster environment.  It featured a great cast, fantastic special effects, cool action and a decent plot involving time travel and an insane Romulan.  The second film was…forgettable.  Even if you ignore the fact that the film was more or less a remake of Wrath of Kahn, it’s not a particularly memorable one.  Like the first film, Into Darkness had good acting, action and special effects but you’ll be hard pressed to remember a thing about after the credits roll outside of comparisons that you’ll inevitably make to Wrath of Kahn.  This latest film is more or less a successor to that format.  It’s a decent enough summer block buster and is a pleasant way to spend a few hours but is not something that you’ll be remembering in the long term, even if it is more true to the franchise’s roots.

            The story takes place a few years after the end of Into Darkness with the crew of the Enterprise well into their five-year voyage.  After arriving at a space colony known as Yorktown at the edge of the frontier, the crew of the Enterprise is contacted by a scientist fleeing from an uncharted nebula and asks Kirk and company for help to retrieve her crew.  After arriving at the planet she claims her crew is on, they are soon attacked by a swarm of tiny ships that quickly destroying the Enterprise and capture the majority of its crew and leave the rest stranded on the planet.  Outnumbered, outgunned and without a ship it’s up to Kirk and company to rescue the crew, find a way off the planet and prevent their leader from obtaining the final piece of an ancient weapon that recently came into their possession. 

            An accurate description of this film and all of its predecessors is that, for better or for worse, they all have a tendency to feel like feature length episodes.  This isn’t necessarily a bad thing but because of this the films end up feeling a bit…well episodic.  You have characters, plotlines and villains that are introduced in each film and they go through their own little arcs and storylines that are resolved by the time the credits roll.  Generally speaking, you never see or hear about these new characters ever again and the storylines have little overall effect on the status quo of the series.  Ultimately this is what this film feels like.  It probably isn’t going to have any long term repercussions on the lore of the series but the plot on display is satisfying in the context of being the latest chapter of these characters’ lives.  For the most part the film is well paced and appropriately builds each plot point throughout its length, with every set piece and plot point introduced ultimately factoring in to the overall story.

            Ultimately, however, the film is not so much a plot driven one but a character driven one.  The characters all have natural chemistry with one another, resulting in some great humor throughout the film that feels natural.  For the first time it feels like the characters are growing as people and becoming more like the characters from the original show.  Unlike the previous films, it actually feels like an ensemble piece that give each of the characters an appropriate amount of screen time and, for the most part, develops them in a pretty significant way.  Spock and McCoy, for example, are stuck together for a significant portion of the film and as a result come to realize how much respect that they have for one another.  The biggest arcs, however, come from Kirk and Spock.  I won’t give too much away, but both characters have significant, potentially life altering events thrust upon them at the start of the film and by the time the film has ended, it feels as though these arcs have come to their natural conclusion.  The standout, however, is Idris Elba as the film’s villain, Krall.  Despite a god-awful makeup job, Krall manages to be an otherwise menacing antagonist with a pretty diabolical plan with a pretty good, tragic backstory to boot.  After a certain point, you’ll probably see some of the twists regarding the character coming but it’s a depressing one all the same that makes you feel for the character in ways that were impossible in the previous two films. 

            The problem with this film is everything else.  Say what you will about the previous films, but they were visually impressive and this film lacks the same level of imagination and technical skill.  The ship and its interior, for example, have been redesigned from the Apple Store look of the previous films to something that looks more like a modern update of the design of the original series.  It’s not a bad move, per say, but it ended up looking far less visually impressive and ended up looking cheaper as a result.  The outpost of Yorktown, likewise looks off.  From a narrative point of view, they manage to pull off what they wanted with this city but from the technical side it looks subpar.  It was obviously going for a sprawling space metropolis look with buildings pointing every which way but a good portion of this city ended up looking like a bunch of building models nailed to 2X4s hanging upside down.  Likewise, the makeup jobs in this film are pretty bland as well.  They’re by no means the worst things I’ve seen in a Star Trek film but while watching this films I was always aware that I was seeing an actor run around with pounds of makeup and prosthetics on their face.  Elba probably gets the worst of it as he unable to do much in terms of facial expressions and seems to be constantly wheezing through his mouth because the makeup won’t allow him to breath.  The action is also pretty bland as well.  The swarm ships are pretty cool and the final solution to how they defeat them is pretty creative, if a bit of a shark jumper, but the rest of the action was just subpar.  Most of the action is made up of the pointing the camera at the actors while they fight and lacks any inventiveness, stunt work, or set piece design that would have made them more interesting. 

            Overall, watching the film is a decent way to spend a couple of hours.  The character play is solid, the humor is good, the action is flawed but never boring and actually succeeds in evolving the characters.  It won’t change your life and is by no means the best Star Trek film out there, but in a summer that has been filled mostly with disappointments and outright disasters this one is a welcome change of pace.  I say give it a watch.

            So until next time, please follow the site, like the Facebook page, follow me ontwitter and come back next time.  Until then, have fun in the final frontier.  

Ghostbusters (2016) Review

So here is a dark confession that I have to make regarding my nerd status: I don’t think that the original 1984 Ghostbusters is an untouchable classic.  This might seem odd when you consider what I am into and the stuff that my blog tends to cover but for me it’s just a decent genre film that was part of a decade that just happened to be full of better genre films.  It lacks the over the top violence and blunt satire of Robocop, the fun factor of Back to the Future, the low budget grit of The Terminator, the sheer industry redefining power of Star Wars and the directorial masterwork of Steven Spielberg in the Indiana Jones films.  Don’t get me wrong.  I feel that the film is a genuinely good one.  It’s just that when it comes to so called classics of the 80s the original Ghostbusters never registered that high on my meter.

            Despite this, even I thought that a remake of the film was a bad idea.  This is primarily because I think that remakes are, in general, a bad idea and waste of everyone’s time and money.  This is especially true when genuinely talented people are involved who could be spending their time and energy doing literally anything else.  The film also didn’t do itself any favors by casting the new Ghostbusters as all women.  There was a good amount of outcry over this but the full force of it wouldn’t be seen until the debut of the first trailer and by God, the negative reaction to it was uncanny.  The various misogynistic jackasses who hated the fact that the film was a female led one, coupled with general remake fatigue and the fact that the trailer itself didn’t look very good effectively created the biggest wave of anti-hype in film history.  The initial trailer was, at the time, the most disliked YouTube video in history and the follow-up trailers didn’t fare much better.  The jokes weren’t particularly funny, the ghosts not very well designed and the characters came off as annoying.  The odds of this film being successful or even good were so stacked against it that I almost skipped it all together.  But, in spite of all of this, the film is actually pretty good.

            The plot revolves around physicist Erin Gilbert, (Kristen Wiig), as she is reunited with her estranged best friend, Abby Yates. (Melissa McCarthy), when she is contacted by a man who is aware of her past as a paranormal researcher to investigate a local tourist attraction that he is convinced is haunted.  Upon investigating the site, they very quickly discover that not only are ghosts real but that someone is intentionally using paranormal technology to bring them into our world.  The two are joined by nuclear engineer, Jillian Holtzmann, (Kate McKinnon), and subway worker/New York City historian Patty Tolan, (Leslie Jones), as hunt for ghosts, create new ghost catching devices as well as fight off the idea that they are frauds who are just looking for attention. 

            The film’s biggest strength is the cast.  All four of the main characters are hilarious, well written, have perfect comedic personas and all have great chemistry with one another.  Wiig, for example, really pulls off the role of a person whose motives are a bit split.  On one hand she wants to be taken seriously by the scientific community but at the same time can’t resist the call of the supernatural when proof of it is, quite literally, floating in her face.  She also proves at several points that she is, when all is said and done, human and that when she is pushed too far she can and will snap.  McKinnon is a ton of fun as the engineer of the group, who brings just the right mixture of mad scientist energy, blunt “this could blow up in your face” humor with a dry, sarcastic demeanor.  The biggest surprise, however, was Jones as Patty.  In spite of all the horrible things that were on display in the trailers, the thing that I was most dreading to see on screen was this character.  Every single advertisement for this character indicated that she was some kind of annoying Tyler Perry-style caricature or would be this film’s equivalent to Chris Tucker’s role in The Fifth Element; i.e. the one African American character in a film who is brought in as comedic relief but ultimately comes off as annoying and possibly racist.  But thankfully, this is not the case.  Patty is, like Winston in the original film, the straight one of the group.  She’s funny and freaks out when the situation calls for it but she quickly proves that she is just as smart and capable as the other members of the team whose knowledge of the city and its history proves invaluable as they chase ghosts.  The only one who gets a little shortchanged is McCarthy.  She’s hilarious and perfectly delivers all of her jokes with the right tone and facial expressions but there just isn’t that much to her character beyond being the other Ghostbusters leader and Wiig’s best friend.  Ultimately though, they are all likeable, funny and you’ll find yourself wanting to spend more time with these characters.

            Another great strength of the film is how it goes about subverting certain genre clichés and film clichés in general.  Remember how in the first film the NYC government immediately dubbed the Ghostbusters as crazy until they needed them for the final act?  You know how something like this happens in every genre film?  Well, within this film, this isn’t the case.  About midway through the film it is actually revealed that the government is fully aware of the existence of ghosts and asks that the protagonists to keep it quite so as not to panic the public.  It’s actually something that makes perfect sense and was a welcome change of pace.  Sure the government officials can be jerks but they never go anywhere near Walter Peck levels of jerks and it made for a refreshing spin on the whole thing.

            Then we have Kevin, played my Chris Hemsworth who is just hilarious.  The whole joke of his character is that he is effectively the male version of the hot but useless secretary that everyone in the office is trying to bang and he pulls it off perfectly.  It’s hilarious just to watch this guy bumble around while trying to figure out how to do basic tasks around the office.  But what’s even funnier is just how creepy Wiig’s character is around him.  Every chance she gets she flirts with him and makes no secret whatsoever that she wants to sleep with him and feels like she is just one wrong step away from a sexual harassment suite.  It’s the one time that the gender flip thing actually effects the characters in the movie and everyone involved pulled it off perfectly.

            The final good thing to note is the technology used in the film.  One of key problems of the original film is that we really don’t see the beta versions of the Proton Packs or how exactly this technology was developed.  They just kind of appear in between scenes and it was something that always made me scratch my head.  This time around we actually get to see an early version of the Proton Packs and the process by which they decided to make certain adjustments to them.  We also get a nice variety of ghost catching weapons that was lacking in the original film and promised interesting ways for the characters to battle ghosts.  The testing periods of the film made for some great physical comedy and the actual functions of the weapons were creative and inventive and is the one area that the film where it undoubtedly improves upon its predecessor.

            Unfortunately, the film suffers from three very big problems.  Two are the main antagonist and the plot.  The main bad guy is just boring.  His ultimate plan is to bring fourth an army of ghosts to overrun the world with him at its head is the kind of plan that we’ve seen a million times by now and it’s just old.  It’s not at all helped by the fact that the character lacks any charisma and his whole motivation is that...you know I don’t think his motivation is ever made clear.  He’s just some random, creepy dude who just decides to start the end of the world because he thinks he will become lord of the ghosts.  That’s about it.  The plot itself doesn’t really amount to much more than the characters running around the city while trying to prevent this guy’s plan from manifesting itself.  The whole thing just feels like it was an afterthought and lacks the subtle satire of the occult and overly elaborate plots that films featuring them tend to contain that the original movie had.

            The final problem is the third act of the film.  The whole thing starts throwing WAY too much fan service at the audience, from the inclusion of Slimer to the Stay Puff Marshmallow Man and even the bad guy taking the form of a something that one of the protagonists thinks up.  While these were nice shout outs, they came far too late in the film and couldn’t helped but feel crammed in, almost as if the producers had a checklist of things that they needed to include in the film lest fans riot.  It’s not at all helped by the fact that the whole third act devolves into a special effects driven action fest that the filmmakers just can’t pull off.  CGI tends to get a lot of crap these days for its overuse but in the case of this film it’s fully deserved.  All of the ghosts look generic and undersigned and you won’t believe that any of them were ever in front of the camera.  The action at the end also feels very by the numbers and obviously staged.  I understand that Paul Feig isn’t exactly an action director and to be fair this isn’t an action film but if you’re going to stage a big, action heavy finale you need to put a little more effort into it.  The whole thing is comprised of “pointing and shooting the camera” while the actors fight off the ghosts and lacks any real tension and fails to thrill.  It’s not at all helped by the fact that while there is supposedly an army of ghosts surrounding them and they only come after the characters a few at a time.  It’s a strange move that breaks not only the tension of the situation but also my suspension of disbelief and is the kind of action movie flaws that filmmakers found ways around over a decade ago and it baffles me that they couldn’t find a better way to stage this whole end fight.

            In the end the new Ghostbusters film is an overall entertaining film.  Is it as good as or better than the original?  Honestly, I don’t know and that’s an argument that I will leave more hardcore fans of the franchise to fight out.  But the film that we have on display here is smart, funny, full of entertaining characters, clever subversions of genre clichés and is a lot of fun.  It’s not a modern classic but I at least recommend that you give it a shot.

            So until next time please follow the site, like the Facebook page and follow me on Twitter.  Until then let’s just hope that the backlash against the trailers doesn’t affect the performance of an otherwise good film.

Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice Ultimate Edition Review

            Of all the films that were due for release this year, Batman V. Superman: Dawn of Justice was probably the one that I anticipated the most.  Man of Steel was a film that I absolutely despised but the prospect of seeing Batman and Superman on the big screen for the first time was too good of a selling point for me not to ignore.  It also helped that the trailers for the film looked really good and promised sprawling, epic fights between the Dark Knight and the Man of Steel, ending with a climactic battle with a big bad in Doomsday.  Unfortunately, the critical reception to the film was overwhelmingly negative and you’ll be hard pressed to find someone that isn’t a complete D.C. fanboy to give the film a glowing review.  Everyone seemed to agree that the first 10 minutes or so were good along with Ben Affleck’s performance as Batman but that the film as a whole was a boring, incoherent mess.  This, coupled with some personal problems, resulted in me deciding to pass on seeing the film and just wait for the inevitable directors cut to come out. 

Earlier this week I was able to see this version of the film.  And, despite all the negative receptions to the film, despite all of the crap talked about, despite having nearly all the major plot points being spoiled for me, somehow it was far worse than I ever imagined.  The Batman V. Superman: Dawn of Justice Ultimate Edition is perhaps one of the most boring and lifeless big budgeted summer blockbusters that I have ever seen put to film and fails spectacularly on nearly every level.  But I’m getting ahead of myself.  The film starts during the climax of Man of Steel with Superman and Zod brawling and destroying half of Metropolis.  After his building in the city is destroyed and killing several people he knows, Batman decides that a creature with as much power as Superman needs to be destroyed.  At the same time, through an overly complicated series of events, Lex Luthor begins to taint the public’s perception of Superman as well as push Batman to kill Superman. 

If there is one positive thing that I can say about the writing of this film, it’s that the initial setup is very well executed.  When you look at what happens in Metropolis at the start of the film, particularly with one child caught up in the mix, you see that not only are Batman’s motives justified through Superman’s actions but that the whole thing affected him on a deeper, personal level and was a brilliant character moment that kind of blew me away.  In fact, most of the stuff that deals with Batman is all around pretty good.  The intro that shows the death of Bruce Wayne’s parents is probably the best version of it ever put to film and Ben Affleck really did defy my initial expectations as the Caped Crusader.  Jeremey Irons performance was simply perfect and may actually be the best live action version of Alfred.  His condensing demeanor and dry sense of humor had me laughing every time he dropped some negative remark about Batman and his life choices and I hope that future Batman films take full advantage of this.  On the same note, Superman is actually pretty good in this as well.  He still isn’t great and it’s obvious that the filmmakers still have trouble deciding what to do with him but he is a big improvement over the version that was portrayed in Man of Steel.  In this film he actually goes out of his way save people instead of endangering them and they really do a great job of establishing why it is he has a beef with Batman.  Unfortunately, the film manages to piss away this otherwise great setup with a film that is not only needlessly grim, but just boring.   

The first major problem with the film is Lex Luthor.  Ignoring the fact that this version of the character has nothing in common with its comic book comic book counterpart, the character has far too big of a role in the film and the vast majority of it has little to contribute to the overall narrative of the film beyond needlessly padding out the runtime.  For example, the character is revealed towards the end to be one who pushes Batman into fighting Superman, mainly though the manipulation of a former Wayne Enterprises employee who was hurt during Superman’s fight with Zod in Man of Steel.  Unfortunately, from a writing standpoint it makes no sense as to why they would include this subplot when Batman’s motivations are made abundantly clear the prologue section of the film.  Supposedly he’s also trying to defame Superman through these actions as well but outside of making him mope over the fact that he can’t always save everyone for a few minutes it really doesn’t have any effect on the character overall.  In fact, the only meaningful things that the character contributes to the plot overall is the importing of the kryptonite rock, the kidnapping of Martha Kent, and the creation of Doomsday and just about everything else involving this character could have easily been cut from the film.  In fact, the creation of Doomsday just adds another problem to the overall narrative of the film.  If, for example, Luthor knew that Batman would more than likely kill Superman, why did he create Doomsday to begin with?  Why did he start the whole thing without a way to take Doomsday down himself?  Better yet, WHY IS DOOMSDAY EVEN IN THIS MOVIE?!?!?

What makes the whole Lex Luthor narrative problem even more infuriating is that it could have been solved with a simple rewrite or a few tricks in post-production.  Lex Luthor fears what Superman could do so he gets the Kryptonite.  Batman catches wind of this and wants it for himself.  Luthor realizes he no longer has the Kryptonite and creates Doomsday to take Superman down so he can serve as the third act monster that unties the heroes together.  How would that have been so hard?

It’s not at all helped by the fact that the film is very grim with an unexpectedly high body count.  Iconic characters like Jimmy Olson and Mercy Graves are unceremoniously killed off in very grizzly fashions with little to no acknowledgement of their legacy in comic book history.  Perhaps what threw me off the most, however, was just how high of a body count Batman had under his belt.  I had heard beforehand that Batman killed a few people in this film but I had always assumed it was similar to the way he “killed” people in the Dark Knight films; where the deaths were either ambiguous or brought on by the actions of others.  HOLY.  MOTHER.  OF.  GOD!  WAS.  I.  WRONG!  He massacres people by the dozens in any way he can.  He uses machine guns, grappling hooks, missiles, his fists, guns and even a wooden crate at one point.  And those that he doesn’t kill he effectively marks for death by branding them with a bat and making them a target for a good shanking in prison.  And I cannot lie.  This really bothered me as a Batman fan.

One of the core rules of Batman, (or at least the modern one), is that he does not kill people.  It is the one line that he refuses to cross because he knows that once he crosses that line he is no better than those he hunts.  While I am aware that this hasn’t always been the case, for a long time it has been and is often a key component between Batman and his relationships with fellow heroes and villains.  What we have on display in this film, however, is that Batman is in fact no better than those he hunts.  In fact, the argument could be made that Superman’s beef with the Bat might actually be more than justified given just how much brutality is on display here.  While he doesn’t quite go into Crazy Steve territory, he gets dangerously close and if this is the direction that they’ll continue with the character I’m not sure I want anything to do with it.

Now all of this could be forgivable is the film was any fun.  Plenty of films have poor narratives and character writing but they can sometimes get away with them by the sheer amount of spectacle and humor that they throw on screen.  But Batman V. Superman offers none of this.  Say what you will about Man of Steel, (lord knows I have plenty to say), but it did offer some pretty cool action sequences that really showed how destructive and over the top a battle between kryptonians would be.  But this film offers none of that.  Outside of one admittedly kick ass fight involving Martha’s kidnappers, not a single action sequence shows any kind of imagination or manages to thrill.  At least half of the film passes before we get our first action scene that amounts to a boring car chase between Batman and Luthor’s goons and then we have to wait another hour before we finally get our battle between the two characters for the first and last time.  Unfortunately, all it amounts to is Batman using some kryptonite gas on the Man of Steel before pounding the crap out of him with his fists and grappling hook and offers none of the imagination or spectacle that was on display in either Man of Steel or The Dark Knight Returns animated film.  And quite frankly, if an animation team working with maybe a tenth of the budget can do a better battle between Batman and Superman that the big budgeted film version something is very wrong. 

Likewise, the final battle with Doomsday is completely unmemorable.  While it is cool to finally see Wonder Woman on the big screen for the first time the fight itself is completely unremarkable.  The whole thing consists of Wonder Woman going after Doomsday with a sword while Batman runs from its heat blasts, as it cuts back to Superman grabbing one of Batman’s kryptonite spears and taking to Lois and utterly fails to choreograph/animate an interesting battle and I found myself wondering if this was really made by the same man who did 300.   

From what I have been told, the theatrical version of this film was an incoherent, boring mess of a movie that appeared to be the negative antithesis to the MCU and any good comic book films that have come out over the past decade.  This Ultimate Edition isn’t quite that.  It is a coherent, boring, mess of a film that appears to be the negative antithesis to the MCU and any of the good comic book films that have come out over the past decade.  The film does have an admittedly good start but is bogged down by a pointless subplot with Luthor, fails to give us any decent action scenes and is just so grim without any real point to it.  I hated Man of Steel when it came out three years ago but this film registers little to no emotion with me.  The whole thing bored me to tears and by the time the credits rolled I was just glad it was over. 

Supposedly the overwhelming negative reception has caused Warner Brothers to realize that they need to rethink the way they do these films.  The Justice League film, for example, is apparently set to have a lighter tone then BVS due to the extremely negative reaction to the film.  Ben Affleck, who was visibly upset at the reception of the film, is promising a Batman film full of sardonic, dry humor and is determined that the project will not move forward until the script is perfect, release dates be damned.  Warner Brothers has also decided to restructure the way it goes about making the films, creating the DC Films Division that will be headed by DC writer Geoff Johns and Warner Brothers Executive Vice President, Jon Berg, so it is obvious that they are at least taking steps to fix the errors that have been made.  However, only time will tell if they have taken the correct steps.

So until next time, please follow the site, like the Facebook page, follow me on twitter and come back next time.  Until then, let’s just hope that Suicide Squad proves better.  

Now I Write on the Nerd Hub!

            Well everyone, it’s time for an announcement.  Today I have officially joined The Nerd Hub, a group that deals with all things nerdy be they video games, comic books, movies or T.V. shows, they cover it all.  Every month I will be contributing at least one article a month to the site as well as helping them promote their articles and vice versa.  It’s an exciting new prospect and I cannot wait to see how it unfolds.  Give their site a look, read a few articles and give the Facebook Page a like and lets all have fun with this stuff.  Until next time, give both our pages a like, follow our sites and twitter accounts.  Let’s all connect in this world.

Trey's Take On Facebook Page

The Nerd Hub.org

The Nerd Hub Facebook Page

Trey's Twitter

The Nerd Hub Twitter

Resident Evil 7 Demo

            Well everyone, E3 is well and over but sadly, as per usual, I wasn’t able to cover as many things as I wanted to.  This was due to a combination of personal obligations, work commitments, and laziness and procrastination.  But after the last article involving Mass Effect: Andromeda, I wanted to end things on a more positive note.  To that end, let’s talk about the teaser for Resident Evil 7.

            The Resident Evil series is one that I cannot help but have mixed feelings on.  I understand that they are a staple of the survival horror genera, but the vast majority of them don’t hold up all that well.  The first three in particular had god awful voice acting, camera restrictions and crappy controls that were more frustrating than anything else, frequently employed genera clichés to an infuriating degree and contained plots that just got more and more ridiculous as time went on.  Resident Evil 4 wisely discarded all the Umbrella Corporation/Zombie baggage and told a much more interesting, self-contained story with a likeable cast of characters, interesting monster designs and far more fluid controls.  Then Resident Evil 5 managed to piss away all the good will the previous game had bought, turning the whole thing into a generic action game and disposing of most of the horror elements.  And Resident Evil 6…. was just terrible on every level.  There were also a number of other spinoff games but to be honest I could never be bothered with them and from the looks of things none of that actually matters with this game anyway.

            What is both fantastic and possibly frustrating about this demo is that it doesn’t actually seem to have anything to do with its predecessors in plot or gameplay.  There doesn’t appear to be any zombies, no Leon, no Chris Redfield, no Jill Valentine and no Umbrella Corporation.  If anything the game is taking notes from P.T., Outlast and Amnesia: The Dark Decent in style and presentation.  The characters you play as are apparently unnamed people who get locked in a haunted house and try to escape as things prevent them and that’s about it.  You explore this house through two different perspectives at different times and the result is something that is truly unsettling and disturbing.  It doesn’t rely on jump scares or quickly moving monsters to scare you.  The horror here is a bit subtler and if you rush through the demo you might just miss it.  As you go through the house you’ll notice that a lot of things about it are a bit off and as you move around things change.  For example, the whole house looks as if it hasn’t been used in decades yet it has relatively freshly cut meet just sitting around hallways.  In the distance you will hear noises but it’s hard to tell where it’s coming from and what exactly it is.  At other times your character will turn his head and look back only to find that several objects in the room have moved in dramatic ways with no indication as to how or why they moved.  At other times you’ll catch a glimpse of something disturbing but will disappear before you have a chance to get a good look.  Above all else, this demo understands that it’s what you don’t see that is the most frightening and plays that card to full effect.

            As far as the general gameplay goes, if this demo is any indication then it will be a game that forces you to use a small number of items to move around wherever your characters is and find your way out of whatever situation you happen to get into.  The over the top arsenal that you had in previous games seems to be gone and shooting your way out is no longer be an option.  But for more on any of this we’ll have to wait until the game comes out and the game explicitly says that what is in this demo may not be a representation of the final game. 

            Overall, the Resident Evil 7 Demo is a pretty good way to spend an hour and easily the best thing that the franchise has put out in a long time.  It was suspenseful, scary, and, above all, did its job and makes me want to buy the game.  It was a great way to end my look at E3 and I can’t wait to see more of this game. 

            So until next time, please follow the site, like the Facebook page and follow me on twitter and let’s hope that these games prove to be as good, (or in some cases better), as the trailers and demos promoting them.